[ Call to Order] [ADOPTION OF SEPTEMBER 16, 2025 MEETING MINUTES ] [(234-25) 15 Elmwood Road – Site Plan Application for a Two-Story House Addition – Environmentally Sensitive Site. ] [(235-25) 10 Gilbert Place – Site Plan Amendment for a Two-Story House Addition- Environmentally Sensitive Site.] [00:04:22] GOOD EVENING LADIES A ND GENTLEMEN. WELCO ME TO THE OC TOBER 21 MEETING O F THE CITY OF WHITE PLAINS PLANN ING BOARD . THE NEXT MEETING OF THIS BOARD WI LL BE TUE SDAY, NOV EMBER 18TH AT 7 P.M. I N THIS CHAMBER . TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18TH , 7 P.M. AND NEX T ITEM ON THIS E VENING 'S AGENDA IS THE ADAPTATION OF THE MINUTES FROM THE SEP TEMBER 1 6TH MEETIN G. ANY OF THE MEMBERS HERE HAVE ANY CORRECTIONS , ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THE MINUTES THAT THEY HAVE AS THEY HAVE BEEN DISTRIBUTED TO US [00:05:01] . OK, I NEE D A MOTION TO ADOPT THE MINUTES AS CIRCULATED . ALL I N FAVOR ? AYE . OK THE FIRST I ' M SORRY , THE FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS THIS EVENING AS WE HAVE BEE N ASKED TO SCHEDULE [(229-25) 221-227 West Street – R1-12.5 (residential one family) zoning district – One Year Extension of Site Plan Approvals for Three Houses. Eighth Extension. Environmentally Sensitive Site.] A PUBLIC HEARING FOR 15 ELMWOOD ROAD . THIS IS A SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR A TWO-STORY HOUSE ADDITIO N ON AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE SITE . PLEASE INTRODUCE YOURSELF. YES, GOOD EVENING, MICHAEL STEIN , PRES IDENT OF HUDSON ENGIN EERING , UH, ENGINEERS O F RECORD FOR T HE PROJECT. UM, SO PROBABLY YOU HAVE 15 ELMWOOD , WE HAVE AN ADDITION GOI NG ON THE HOUSE . THERE ARE STEEP SLO PES TO THE REAR OF THE P ROPERTY , UH, WHICH TRIGGERS THE THRESHOLD TO C OME BEFORE T HE BOARD. THE RE , UH, ADDITION DOES NOT HAVE ANY DISTURBA NCE OF STEEP SLOPES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION . EITHER FOR THE A DDITION OR THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM . OK . ARE YOU GOING TO WALK US THROUGH THE PROJECT? SUR E. IS ALL THE STEEP SLOPES ON THE PROPERTY . UH, THIS ACTUALLY WAS AN APPLICATION SEVERAL YEARS AGO THAT W E CAME BE FORE THE BOARD . THEY HAD , UH, FILLED IN T HE REAR OF THE PROPERTY AND THEY WERE ISSUED A VIOLAT ION, UH, FOR DISTURBANCE OF THE S TEEP SLOPES AND FOR FILLING IN , UM, WE HAD GONE THROUGH ALL THE APPROVALS OF THAT PRE VIOUSLY . UH, SIO WAS ISSUED . NOW WE 'RE B ACK FOR AN ADDI TION ON, UH, ADDITION TO THE REAR OF THE HOUSE . UH, THAT WE 'RE GON NA HAVE A STOR MWATER MANAGEMENT SYS TEM THAT GOES IN T HAT TREATS ALL THE RUNOFF COMING FROM THE ROOF . SO, BUT AGAIN, EVEN WITH THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GOING IN, THERE ARE NO DISTURBANCES , STEEP SLOPE S FOR THE CONSTRUCTION . THANK YOU . ANY MEMBERS HAVE A NY QUESTIONS? I , I SHOULD INTRODUCE THE MEMBERS T O MY IMMEDIATE R IGHT , LIZ MARINEN , LAUREN MOR RIS , AND TO MY LEFT, SERENA RUSSELL . TO MY IMMEDIATE LEFT , OUR BOARD SECRETARY EILEEN M CLEAN AND OUR LEGAL COUNSEL IS MIKE KELLY , AND FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, BEATR ICE CAPTAIN . SORRY . AND I JUST WANT TO LET T HE BO ARD KNOW THAT THE REASON THAT YOU HAVE THIS FIRST SIGHT PLAN AMENDMENT I S BEC AUSE OF THOSE STEEP SLOPES IN THAT SHADED AREA AT THE BACK OF THE S ITE. BUT THE A DDITION IS NOT GOING INTO THOSE STEEP SLOPES . AN Y MORE QUEST IONS? MY , MY ONLY CONCERN WERE EROSION CONTROLS DURING , UH, C ONSTRUCTION. I 'M SURE THEY 'RE THERE, BUT I DIDN ' T SEE THEM AND THE CITY WILL INDEE D ENFORCE WHATEVER THE RULES ARE, BUT CAN YOU JUST D ESCRIBE SO WE HAVE 7 CONTROL. WE HAVE SILENCES GOING ALONG THE REAR DIST URBANCE HERE , UM, THAT 'S SOMETHING OF A D ISTURBANCE, B UT THAT 'S AGA IN SAYING A LOT OF STEEP SLOPES . SO . YOU 'RE WELCOME. LAURE N, NO QUESTIONS . SERENA . OK , I NEED A MOTION TO SCHEDULE A PUBLIC H EARING F OR THE NOVEMBER 18T H M EETING. ALL IN FAVOR ? THANK YOU ALL RIGHT YOU W ANT TIM GIL BERT AS WELL? OK . UH , THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA , 10 G ILVER PLACE. T HIS IS THE SITE PLAN AMENDMENT . FOR A TWO-STO RY HOUSE ADDITION ON AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE SITE . GO OD EVENING, STEIN , PRESIDENT OF FUDDSON ENGINEERING , ENGINEERS , ENGINEERS OF REC ORD FOR THE P ROJECT. UH , SO , UH, SIMI LAR TO THE, THE , THE FIRST APPLICATION , WE HAVE A VARIOUS ADDITI ONS GOING ON THE HOUSE. THE REASONS B EFORE THE PLANNING BOARD IS BECAU SE WE HAVE STEEP SLOPES ON T HE PROPERTY , UH, THE HILLSIDE ALONG HERE ARE ALL STEEP S LOPES COMING THROUGH . UH, THERE 'S SOME MI NOR STEEP SLOPES UP IN THIS AREA. THE ADDITIONS ON THE HOUSE ARE, THERE 'S O NE ON THE FRONT AS WELL A S ONE UH, P ROPOSED DECK A ND A REAR GEAR. UH , THE IMPROVEMENTS B ASICALLY FALL OUTSIDE OF T HE , THE , THE STEE P SLOPES , WITH THE EXCEPT ION OF THE STAIRS , A STAIR LANDING , WHICH IS JUS T ON THE EDG E OF THE STEEP SLOPES . SO SOME SEDIMENT EROSION CONTROL WILL ENCROACH WITHIN THE, THE STEEP SLOPE AREA . OK WE 'LL START WITH SERENA THIS TIME. A NY QUESTIONS ? LAUR EN LIZ ? IT 'S CERTAINLY A CHAL LENGING SITE , SO , UH GOOD LUCK . THANK YOU ALL RIGHT, I NEED A MOTION TO SCHE DULE A PUBLIC H EARING FOR NOVEMBER 18TH . CAN I H AVE A SECOND AL L IN FAVOR THANK YOU VERY MUCH. HAVE A GREAT EVENING, EVERYON E. THANK YOU. NEXT ITEM ON THIS EVENING 'S AGEN DA, 221-227 WES T STREET . UH IT 'S AN R12-5 ZONING DISTRICT . SO ONE-YEA R EXTENSION O F SITE PLAN APPROVALS FOR 3 HOUSES . THIS IS THE 8TH EXTENSION ON AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE S [00:10:01] ITE . UH, GOOD EVENING , HONORABLE CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING BO ARD . MY NAME 'S ANGELA P OCHA. I 'M AN ASSOCIATE A T THE LAW FIRM OF SNYDE R AND SNYDER, AND WE REPRESE NT THE WYNDWARD SCHOOL IN CONNECTION WITH THIS MATTER. UM, A S YOU MAY RECALL , TH E WYNDWARD SCHOOL WAS GRANTED SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE 3 RESIDENTIAL HOMES O N WEST STREET. UM, THE Y STILL P LAN ON MOVING FORWARD WIT H THIS PROJEC T, AND THEY ARE NOT PROPOSING ANY CHA NGES TO THE SITE P LAN AT THIS TIME. UM , HOWEVER , THE SCHOOL JUST RECENTLY COMPLET ED CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW 1 275 MAMARANIC AVENUE CAMPU S, AND SO HAVE PRIORITIZED [(230-25) T-Mobile – 709 Westchester Avenue; CO Campus Office Zoning District – Eligible Facility Request to Upgrade an Existing Cellular Antenna Facility. ] SOME OTHER ENHANCEM ENTS FOR THE SCHOOL AND EDUCATION P URPOSE S AT THIS TIME . SO THEY 'RE RESPECTFULLY REQUE STING A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF THE APPROVAL . JUST SO THE BOARD KNOWS AT THE MEETING TONIGHT, I DIST RIBUTED BECAUS E SOME OF YOU WEREN 'T EVEN ON THE B OARD AT THE TIME . UM, T HE ONE , THE, THE PROJECT SITE, THE OVERA LL SITE , AND THIS , UM, SUBDI VISION AND SIT E PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE 3 HOMES WENT THROU GH A VERY EXTENSIVE PUBLIC REVIEW PROCESS. THERE ' S A LOT OF NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT. TH E SITE IS , UM, EN VIRONMENTALLY SEN SITIVE WITH THE STEEP SLOPES , ROCK OUTC ROPPINGS , AND LOTS OF WE TLANDS . SO, UM THE SITE PLANS THEY ORIGINA LLY CAME IN WITH MANY MORE LOTS , AND IT WAS REDUCED D OWN TO REAL LY THE SMALLISH BUILDABLE AREAS FOR THESE HOUSES . NO CHANGES ARE PROPOSED TO THE APPROVED HOUSES AT THIS TIME OK. DO WE NEED TO QUE STION WHETHER OR NOT THE ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES HAVE CHANGED . IN 8 YEARS HM FOR THE EXTENSION FOR AN EX TENSION OF THE SITE PLANS ? DO WE HAVE TO WE NEED 5 VOTES BECAUSE IT ' S SO ENVIRONMENT SENSITIVE. CORRECT. WE NEED A 5TH VOTE YEAH, I DIDN 'T, I DIDN ' T NOTICE IT E ITHER . SO IS THE PROVISION IN T HE ZONIN G ORDINAN CE THAT ALL ENVIRONMENTAL ISTS APPROVA LS FOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE SITES REQ UIRE A SUPERMAJORI TY OF T HE THEN TH E TOTAL NUM BER OF P OTENTIAL MEMBERS OF THE BOARD SINCE THEY 'RE 7 POT ENTIAL MEMBERS , WE NEED AT LEAST 5 VOTES TO APPROVE MAKE ANY APPROVALS SINCE WE ONLY HAVE 4 MEMBE RS HERE TONIGHT . WE CAN 'T GIVE A, A FIFTH VOTE . ALSO BUT BECAUSE THE REQUEST WAS SUBMITTED IN A TIMELY MANNER. THE A PPROVALS ARE S TILL VALID UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE BOARD DOES VOTE ON IT , AND WE 'RE GOING T O BE POSSIBLY 4 MEMBERS IN NOVEMBER UNLESS WE HAVE NEW APPOINTEES TO THE B OARD . UM , SO DO WE WANT TO ADJOURN TO BE MISSING ONE IN NOVEM BER? YES , SERENA 'S OUT I N NOVEMBER . OK. IN THE MEANTIME , CAN I JUST ASK TWO QUESTIONS OR I DON 'T WANT TO HOLD THIS UP FOR ADJOURNING , BUT I WAS J UST CONCERNED ABOUT WHETHER AGAIN IN THE ACTUAL ENVIRONMEN TAL ISSUES HEIGHTENED TO THAT CHANGED AS FAR AS T HE WETLANDS AND THE TREE REMOVAL . I MEAN , IT 'S BEEN 8 YEARS , UM WOULD YOU [(231-25) 2 Hunting Ridge Road; R1-7.5 Zoning District – Site Plan Amendment. Amending a driveway plan that was previously approved by the Planning Board as part of a 2-lot subdivision. ] BE DOING NEW VERIFICATION OF ANY OF THE, OF THE WET LANDS AREAS OR DEC RULES FOR WETLA NDS, ETC . AT THIS T IME IT HASN ' T BEEN EXPLORED , U M, YOU KNOW, SIN CE WE ARE ONLY ASKING FOR AN EXT ENSION, BUT I ASSUME AS WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THE PROJECT AND, YOU KNO W, START TO MOVE TOW ARDS CONSTRUCTION THAT THOSE I SSUES WILL BE REASSESSED AT THAT TIME . OK, THA NK YOU. THE BOARD CAN MAKE THAT A CONDI TION OF THE SITE PLAN EXTENSION AS W ELL BE CAUSE IT 'S NOT NECESSARILY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT WILL G O TO THE THE SAME EXTENT THAT YOU W ILL. IT 'S ON YOU R RADAR MORE , UM, OK . UH CAN I HAVE A Q UESTION YE S. CAN WE SEE IF WE CAN GET A QUICK MEETING BETWEEN MAYBE ? HOLD ON IF WE HAV E TO GET 5 PEOP LE . WE COULD DO THAT , BUT I 'M INCLINED TO BELIEVE THAT YOU WIL L NOT BE START ING CONSTRUC TION BEFORE NUMBER. THAT 'S CORRECT SO T HERE 'S NO SOMETIMES I THINK IT 'S IMPORTANT BECAUSE WE 'RE REALLY HOLDING PEOPLE UP, BUT I DON ' T KNOW THA T THAT 'S THE CASE HERE . I ALSO HAVE, I HAVE GOOD REASON TO BELIEVE WE WILL HAVE 1/5 MEMBER FOR NEXT M ONTH. ANOTH ER MEMBER FO R NEXT MONTH. SO , WHY DON ' T WE SCHEDULE THIS ON NEXT MONTH OVER TILL NEXT MONTH, AND WE WILL LET YOU KNOW IF THAT IS NOT THE CASE . OK . WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE EXPIRATION DATE WILL BE. THEY DON 'T, THEY WON 'T EXPIR E . OK, AND FOR T HE. DOES NOT EXPIRE . I J UST SAID AN D I APOLOGIZE FOR NOT HAVIN G THE 5TH V OTE TONIGHT. I 'M V ERY SORRY . OK . THANK YOU. THANK Y OU SO MUCH I DID CALL IT A CONVENT IONAL CYCLING YEAH. T-MOBILE . 709 WESTCHESTER AVENUE . THIS IS A CAMPUS OFFICE ZONING DIS TRICT . THIS IS AN ELIGIBLE FACILITIE S RE QUEST TO UPGRADE AN EXISTING CELLUL AR FACILITY , UH, IT 'S A CHANGE TO AN ACTUAL EXISTING [00:15:01] FACILITY . PLEASE, GOOD EVENING. FOR THE RECORD, MY NAME IS DAVID KENNY F ROM SNY DER AND SNYDER HERE TONIGHT TO RE PRESENT THE APPLICANT T-MOBILE NORTH EAST LLC . UH, YES, IT I S AN EXIST ING FACIL ITY. T-MOBILE CURRENTLY HAS 9 ANTENNAS IN 3 DIFFERENT SECTORS . UM, THIS APPLICATION IS TO REPL ACE 6 OF THOSE ANTENNAS AS LONG , UH , ALONG WITH RELAT ED EQUIPMENT , UH, THE MOUNTS ARE NOT CHANGING, SO T HE PHYSICAL LOCATI ONS OF THE ANTENNAS ARE NOT CHANGING ON THE ROOFTOP AND THE APP LICATION IS KNOWN AS AN ELIGIB LE FACILITIES REQUEST . UM , WE 'VE DISCUSSED IT, I BELIE VE , ON PAST APP LICATIONS OF SIMILAR SWAP OUTS . BASICALLY, THE FEDERAL LAW WANTS TO ENCOURAGE , UH, CO-LOCATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS OF EXISTING SITES RATHER THA N BUILDING NEW S ITES, UM, SO THEY PUT OUT A LAW TO STREAMLINE THAT PROCESS , UM, BUT I 'M HERE TONIGHT T O ANSWER ANY QUE STIONS THE BOARD MAY HAVE . DO WE HAV E ANY QUESTIONS ANYONE WHAT HE WILL BE . SO THE , UM, THERE WILL BE A LITTL E BIT LARGER IN TENNIS. THE Y 'RE GONNA BE A LITTLE BIT L ARGER , UM, B UT THEY 'RE GONNA B E AT THE SAME MOUNTS , ESSENTIALLY, SO , UM , YOU KNOW, THEY 'RE NOT GONNA BE ENOUGH TO CREATE WHAT IS CALLED A SUB STANTIAL CHANG E . IT 'S PROBABLY ABOUT 1 FT DIFFERENCE FROM WHAT NOW. T HE MIDDLE ONE WILL S EEM A LITTLE BIT TALLER , A LITTLE T ALLER OR A LITTLE WIDER ? A LITTLE TALLER , A LITTLE TALLER A COU PLE IT SEEMED A LIT TLE WIDER THAN I 'D SE EN BEFORE, SO , YEAH, YEP , SO THEY , THEY COME IN , IN DIFFEREN T KIND OF , UM, FOR THE FREQUENC IES, THEY HAVE DIFF ERENT ANTENNAS THAT ARE DESIGNED FOR EACH OF THE FREQUENCIES O R THE BANDS OF FREQUENCIES , UM , SO EACH TIME THEY HAVE A MOD IFICATION OR THEY HAVE A NEW KIN D OF NEED FOR THE FACILITY OR AN UPGRADE IN EQUIPMENT , KIND OF GIVE I T A LITTLE B IT OF A DIFFERENT SIZE , A LITTLE BIT DIMENSION OF THE AN TENNA. TH ANK YOU . I NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS REQUEST , SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS AND CONDITI ONS OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL AND SUBJECT TO WHATEVER TESTING DPW DEEMS NECESSARY. UM, FACILITY COMES ONLINE . ABSOLUTELY, WE 'LL FILE THAT A S PART OF OUR CO APPLICATION AND THIS IS AN EXISTING SITE THAT ALRE ADY HAS THE $35 00 ESCROW ESTABLISHED SO THAT THE DPW ON TH EIR PERIODIC TESTING CAN ALSO PERFOR M AT THIS SITE . GREAT MOTION . 2. ALL I N FAVOR? ALL R IGHT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. HAVE A GREAT NIGHT . OK . NEXT ITEM ON THE AGEND A , 2 HUNTING RIDGE ROAD . THIS I S THE SITE [(232-25) Adora Row – 80 Westchester Avenue – One-year Extension of Site Plan Approval. Common Council referral.] PLAN AMEN DMENTS . THIS IS AMENDING A DRIVEWAY PLAN PRE VIOUSLY APPRO APPROVE D BY THE PLANNING BOARD AS PART OF A TWO-LOT SUBDIVISION . ANYONE HERE REPRESENTING 22 HUNT ING RIDGE ROAD . PLEASE INTRODUCE YOURS ELF GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS PIERRE SAYERS, AND I 'M WITH SARS IN ARCHITECTURE AND I 'M HERE REPRESENTING THE OWNERS AT 06:25 . SO THE SE ARE THE NEW OWNERS. THESE ARE NOT THE ORIGINAL APPLICAN TS FOR THE SUBDIVISION . UM , WE ARE WE ACTUALLY , UH, GOT APPROVALS FROM DPW , UM, LOC ALLY AND WESTCHESTER COUNTY FOR THE CURB CUT AND THE RETAINING WALL IN THE DRIVEWAY . AND WE 'RE JUST, WHAT WE HAVE I N FRONT OF YOU TODAY IS A , AN AMEN DMENT, WHA T WE FEEL IS A MI NOR AMENDMENT TO WHAT WAS PR EVIOUSLY APPROVED BY A NOTHER APPLICANT . WHAT WAS THE REASON FOR T HE CHANGE ? AH , GOOD QUESTION . SO WE , UH, UH, W E PLAN ON , ON COMING B ACK AND HAVING ANOTHER APPLICATION FOR IN ADDITION TO TH E EXISTING HOUSE AND A TW O-CAR GARAGE . IF WE WERE TO PUT IN THE GARAGE TO THE , UH , THE DRIVEWAY , THE CURB CUT THAT WAS , THAT WAS APPROVED PREVI OUSLY UH , AND INSTALL THAT WE 'D HAVE TO RIP IT ALL OUT AND RE CONFIGURE IT FOR THE NEW , IF WE GET APPROVALS , UH, FROM THE PLANNING B OARD FOR A TWO-CAR GA RAGE . ALL OF THAT WOULD HAVE TO COME OUT FOR US TO BE ABLE TO UM TO UM TO CONSTRUCT THE TWO-CAR GARAGE AND THE ADDITION TO THE HOUSE. SO THAT, THAT 'S THE REASO NING BEHIND THIS . WHAT WE 'RE HOPING FO R TONIGHT IS TO GET AN AP PROVAL SO THA T WE CAN INSTALL THE CURB CUT AND THE RETAINING WALL, T HE ASPHALT DRIVEWAY . UH, AND GET O UR PLAT FILED SO WE CAN HAVE AN OFFICIAL , UM, UH, SUBDIVISION . OK , SO YEAH , Y OU, UM , AS YOU MAY RECALL, THERE WAS A LOT OF DISCUSSI ON ABOUT THE DRIVEWAY [(233-25) El Primo – 166B Mamaroneck Avenue – Special Permit for an Accessory Cabaret. Common Council referral ] THAT WAS TO GO I N THERE . AND I PROVIDED YOU TONIG HT WITH A DRAWING S HOWING THE ORIGINALLY APPRO VED LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE LINE AND THE NEW LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE LINE AND JUST COMPARING WHAT WAS APPR OVED AND WHAT WAS SUBMITTED FOR A BUILDING PERMIT . THEY ARE ON THE BRINK OF RECEIVING A BU ILDING PERMIT , BUT I FELT THAT IT WAS A BIT DIFFERENT FROM THAT THE T WO DRAWINGS WERE DIFFERENT FROM EACH OTHER. AND , UM, WAS LOOKING FOR A SIGN-OFF FROM YOU, B UT YOU DON 'T ACTUALLY HAVE ANY APPROVA L AUTHORIT Y OVER T [00:20:01] HIS. YOU C AN MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE COMMISSIONER OF BUILDING WHO HAS INDICATED NO OBJ ECTION TO TH E CHANGES THAT HAVE BEEN MADE AN Y MEMBERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGA RDING THIS ? DO I 'M , I ' M NOT REALLY UN DERSTANDING THE DIFFERENC E BETWEEN WHAT WAS APPROVED IS. WHAT IT IS T HEY 'RE LOOKING FOR SU RE, IT 'S , UH, IT ' S ESSENTIALLY THE SAME CONFIGURAT ION. I T 'S JUST A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT . IT 'S , UM , IT 'S, UH, IT 'S, IT ' S A LITTLE BIT DEEPER AND IF YOU LOOK AT THEM SIDE BY SIDE, I THINK WE PROVIDED UH THE PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED AND THEN W HAT 'S BEING PROPOSED . THEY 'RE VERY SMALL CHA NGE . IT 'S, IT 'S ESSENTI ALLY , UM, A TURNAROUND , UH, THE DIMENSION S ARE A LITTL E BIT DIFFERENT . AND THEN THE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE IS ACTUALLY LESS THAN WHAT W AS APPROVED , UM, SO THAT 'S , THAT ' S A , IT 'S , IT 'S ESSENTIALLY THE SAME THING. IT ' S JUST A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT BECAUSE AGAIN, WE 'RE GOING TO BE IN FRONT O F YOU F OR A TWO-CAR GAR AGE IN THE FUT URE . AND THE , THE , THE CONTO URS ARE RETAINING WALL A ND THAT TU RNAROUNDS A LIT TLE BIT DIFFER ENT THAN WHAT WAS , UH, SU BMITTED ORIGINALLY . BE FORE. YES , YES . WE 'RE , WE 'RE HOPING TO FILE THIS A ND GET OUR OF FICIAL SUBDIVISION . LAURA , GOOD, SERENA ? OK . ALL RIGHT , I GUESS WE , I NEED A MOTION TO DRAFT A LETTER TO T HE COMMISSIONER OF BUILD ING THAT WE DON 'T OBJECT TO THIS CHANGE . ALL IN FAV OR? AYE . THANK YOU SO MUCH. HAV E A GOOD NIGHT . NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA , ADORA RO E . TH IS IS A ONE-YEAR EXT ENSION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL . THIS IS A REFERRAL FROM T HE COMMON COUNCIL . PLEASE I NTRODUCE YOURSELF. GOOD EVENING . MY N AME IS AARON WARNER . I 'M AN ASSOC IATE WITH ZA RIN AND STEINMETZ ON BEHAL F OF TOLL BROTHERS , UH, MR. STEINMETZ REGRETS THAT HE COULDN 'T BE HERE TON IGHT. HE ' S AT A PUBLIC HEARING IN BRIARCLIFF . HE ALSO SAYS THAT , UH, I D REW THE SHORT STR AW TONIGHT, B UT, UH, I 'M HAPPY TO BE HERE AND IT 'S NICE TO MEET YOU ALL . TELL THEM WE WON ' T HOLD IT AGAINST HIM. I WILL , UM, SO WE 'RE HERE TO NIGHT ON REFERRAL FROM THE COMMON COUNCIL , WHICH G RANTED AMENDED SITE PLAN APPROVA L TO REQUEST AN EXTENSION OF THE SITE PLAN APP ROVALS . SINCE THE P REVIOUS SITE PLA N APPROVALS TOLL BROTHERS HAS BEEN WORKING D ILIGENTLY TO COMMEN CE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT AND FINANCE THE PROJECT , UH, WITH BOTH DEBT AND E QUITY . ON THAT FRONT , MR. STEINMETZ HAS A MEETING WITH CITY MEMBERS LATER THIS WEEK TO DISCUSS UH , AMENDING THE PILOT STRU CTURE, WHICH WAS ORIGINALLY DONE FOR THE PROJE CT BACK IN 20 19 . UM, IN LIG HT OF THE FACT THAT IT ' S NOW YEARS LATER AND NOW THERE 'S 58 MORE UNITS FOR THE PROJECT. UH, THE PROJECT IS HAVING DIFFICU LTY PENCILING OUT . UM , TOLL BROTHERS OWNS THE L AND AND THE PROJECT , AND T HEY, THEY NEED , THEY NEED THIS TO GO THROUGH IN SHORT , WE NEED AN EXTENSION OF THE S ITE PLAN APPROVA LS TO HAVE M ORE TIME TO FIGURE THIS OUT, BUT UH, THE CITY ' S WORKING DILIGE NTLY W ITH US, AND WE 'RE CONFIDENT THAT WE 'LL BE ABLE TO MAKE THIS WORK WITH MORE TIME. IS THIS THE SAME AS THE LAST SITE PLA N THAT WE APP ROVED A YE AR AGO ? NO CHANGES TO THAT . NO CHANG ES . THE 5 8 UNITS ADDITIONAL CAME AS PART OF A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO. T HAT 'S RIGHT. YEAH . IT WAS PART O F A REZONING B ECAUSE HALF OF T HE SITE W AS Z ONED. ONE THING AND HALF THE SIT E WAS ON THE OTHER , BUT THEY OBT AINED, UH AN AME NDMENT OF THA T ANYBODY HAVE A NY COMMENTS NEED A MOTION T O DRAFT THE LETTER S OF THE COMMON COUNC IL THAT WE HAVE NO OBJ ECTION TO THIS EXTENSION . WE HAVE A SECOND , ALL IN FAVOR . THANK YOU VERY M UCH. HAVE A GO OD NIGHT . THE LAST ITEM ON T HE AGE NDA, EL PR IMO ONE , SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY CABARET . A REFERRAL FROM THE COMMON COUN CIL, AND I DON 'T SEE ANYBODY HERE BUT IF YOU WANTED TO VOTE ON IT, DO WE W ANT TO P ROCEED WITH THIS ? I MEAN , DO WE NEED PARTICIPATION WHEN SOMETHING IS REFER RED TO US, WE SHOUL D HAVE THA T 30 DAYS TO AND I DON 'T KNOW. KNOW. THERE 'S ANOTHER UH, IN THE MEA NTIME, SO UM , WE CAN, W E CAN S AY THAT WE HAVE AN OBJECTION THAT WE DON 'T HAVE AN OBJECTION , AND WE CAN SAY THAT WE DON 'T HAVE AN OPINION UM, THERE 'S, I T 'S A REFERRAL , IT 'S NOT AN APPROVAL . I MEA N, TYP ICALLY CABARETS IN THAT DISTRICT . WE ALMOST AUTOMATIC ALLY APPROVE A BUILDING HAS TO MONITOR THE, THE NOISE AND OBVIOUSLY PUBLIC SAFETY H AS TO TAKE CARE OF EVERYTHIN G ELSE, SO I DON ' T HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO MOVING THIS OFF THE AGENDA . AND RIGHT OH . I NEED A MOTION TO DRAFT A LETTER TO THE C OMMON COUNCIL . [00:25:01] UH IN ABSENTIA, I GUESS T HAT WE DON ' T OBJECT TO THIS LICENSE . SPECIAL PERMIT I D O HAVE ONE QUEST ION, SOR RY. HOW LONG IS , UH, SPECIAL PERMIT USUALLY GOOD FOR ? IT 'S A YEAR , BUT, UM , THEY DON 'T HAVE TO COME BACK T O US EVERY YEAR . THAT WAS A FAIRLY ADMINISTRATIVELY A PPROVED THEM AFTER, AFTER WE DO THE INI TIALS THEY 'VE HAD COMPLAINTS OR THEY 'VE GOTTEN VIOLATIONS FROM OF THE NOISE OR OTHER RELATE THE OTHER PROBLEMS WITH THE BUSINESS RELATED TO THE CABARET . THE SPECIAL PERMIT DOESN 'T MEAN THE CABARET LICENS E IS SEP ARATE FROM THE SPECIAL PERMIT SO THEY NEED THE SPECIAL PERMI T IN ORDER TO APPLY FOR THE CABA RET LICENSE , AND THAT 'S A WHOLE DAY , SO THEY DO TWO BECAUSE I DO THEM F OR SOME RESTAURANTS , SO I ' M VERY FAMILIAR . RIGHT. DO WE HAVE A MOTION IN THE 2ND ? SO 2. A LL I N FAVOR? AYE . OK , SO THAT ' S A NO OBJECTION LETTER AND THAT LOOKS LIKE THAT 'S THE WHOLE MEANING . A OF MAKE A MOTION T O GO INTO EXEC UTIVE SESSION . UH, LITIGATION REGAR DING THE MATTER IN THE APPELLATE DIVISION, THE 2ND DEPARTMENT . OF, UM, BOARD OF MANAGERS AT WE STONS TOWERS VERSUS THE UH PLAYING BOARD AND DISH WIRELESS . OK . I NEED A MOTION . I NEED A SECOND. A SECOND . ALL IN FAVOR ? NO . SO WE TURN O FF THE GAME, RITA . [00:35:40] OK [00:35:41] . I NEED A MOTION TO COME OUT OF EXECUTIVE SESSION . AL L IN FAVOR ? AND I NEED A MOTION TO CONCLUDE THE M EETING . ALL IN FAVOR ? AYE. THANK YOU , EVERYONE * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.